The two I would suggest are Wheelock's and the Cambridge Latin course, which represent two different strands of learning. There are *many* textbooks out there and none are perfect. The alternative might give you an easier break at first, but you'll still have difficulty mastering the language. Later on ecclesiastical Latin will seem like a piece of cake. It's easier to start with what is more difficult. ![]() and then give me half a page of Latin.If you want to learn to read Classical Latin, I think it's best to use a Classical grammar. ![]() I think that this would be invaluable to understanding some of the translation choices (and the theological impact of these choices) that our English versions have made.Ģ) I want to be able to read Caesar's The Gallic Wars, as well as other primary sources of Roman History in relation to the historical period impacting on the early church.ģ) I want to be able to understand the commentators, particularly from the 19th century, who, in seeking to make a point regarding the New Testament often say, "So and so says it perfectly". I want to learn Latin for several reasons.ġ) I want to be able to read the Vulgate. ![]() ![]() I have never studied Latin, but it has been a desire for some time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |